DesignAddict Forums


	> Edit your post


	title of this thread your message Very good points. Thanks. I,m still thinking about it. Another thing: Is furniture ("original" "signed") over valuated VS architecture("original" "signed") under valuated? Let's see, take a chair...: "a classic", "original" ,"designed by a famous classic designer", chair, How many time more cost vs ordinary/regular one?, 5 times/10 times/ 20times/ up to 50times? Now take an architecture building...: "a classic", "original" ,"designed by a famous classic architect" building /house How many time more cost vs ordinary/regular one?, 1 and 1/2 times / up to 2 ? 3 times! First I thought, one reason could be: well somebody could have spend 20,000 extra in a chair, but not many 20,000,000 extra for a house. OK, but, if we compare with pictures? masterpieces, I mean (a Picasso, a Van Gogh), they could cost 150,000,000! No way, architecture "signed" houses are under-valuated to me. Plus: If have an "original" chair, Designed by, let's say Le Corbusier, it will be sharing his "originality" with 10.000/100.000 other "originals" produced legally 60 years later..., hard to find the Le Corbusier hand their endeed. Compared with the original house designed by Le corbuiser, only one, a single piece, "haute couture", made to the size and needs to the original customer... Is furniture over-valuated and architecture under-valuated? associated web images (optional) associated web link (optional) your email your password create a forums account \| you forgot your password?