  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
01-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
More about Nelson Clocks
Well....it's been a bit of a drought lately, but I just won two Meridian ceramic clocks off eBay:
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
02-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Cool
clocks, Barry. A nice addition to your already extensive collection. I need your advice, (or anyone else's). I bought one of those 1970 Nathan George Horwitt for Howard Miller Museum Clocks that was just mentioned on a thread a few days ago. It's the all black one with the big white dot that represents 12 o'clock. It is for resale. The matte white paint around the edge has scratches on it that could be easily fixed with a fresh coat of paint. Should I do that myself or just sell it like it is? I mean, it's a quick easy fix that would restore it to near mint condition, but would a collector prefer to do that him/herself? Paint or not paint, what do you think?
|
 |
 |
posted by Riki
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
02-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Hard to tell about what to do with that Museum Clock.....
It's not going for all that much, so I guess i'd try to restore it so you can get as much as possible...but I doubt it would be worth anymore than $30 or $40.
I have been lucky finding wall clocks, but I haven't a single table model!
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
02-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
clocks
Nice clocks! I like the orange one.
I just bought a HM museum clock in excellent condition. I think I paid $40 for it. I also got a Weinberg clock in wonderful condition. :) It just came in the mail and I love it!
|
 |
 |
posted by rockybird
edited on 03-Nov-08 01:09 AM [edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
02-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
really like the top one, the ...
really like the top one, the colour combo is great!
|
 |
 |
posted by pete1979
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
03-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
mmmmm.. nice!
Excellent scores Barry!
You got a couple nice clocks for the collection! I'm very envious!
|
 |
 |
posted by black651
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
04-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Also just got this cute 1969
Arthur Umanoff Swing Timers clock (#911)
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
05-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
I like the Umanoff
Nice clock, Barry.
Just to make sure this threat stays clear, it is my understanding that none of the ceramic meridian clocks were designed by Nelson, though they were distributed by Howard Miller. [Nelson's office did design the earlier, rare ceramic table models in 1953). Please let me know if anyone has contrary information, but I understand this has been confirmed through review of the Nelson archive.
|
 |
 |
posted by MidMod50
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
06-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Museum clock
Barry, I did paint the clock and it came out so well, I can't part with it and I'm keeping it. Did this clock originally come with a second hand?
|
 |
 |
posted by Riki
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
06-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
I'm not sure about the second hand, possibily not.
As to the Meridian Clocks, since all of them have the copyrighted Nelson hands, as well as the Rosewood clock with the silver frame and 12 small sound silver discs - hour indicators (7564) being part of the Meridian brochure, I'm certain that they were approved by the George Nelson office. My guess is that Howard Miller and the Italian ceramic factory (Bitossi?) got together and a number of designs were submitted to Miller and Nelson and the arrangement was made. I'm certain that Irving Harper was involved.
So, I consider them Nelson clocks. (The brochure is dated 1964).
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
06-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Meridian Clocks
I don't think either Nelson or Harper had anything to do with those clocks, Barry. I understand Howard Miller had the right to use the hands so they sent them to Italy to be stuck onto some ceramic disks. Another example is Umanoff, who designed many Howard Miller Clocks after Nelson, but regularly "borrowed" Nelson's hands for his designs.
You will also note in the brochures that the Meridian clocks claim they come from the "skills of well-known designers and artist-craftsmen" whereas those clocks designed by Nelson are VERY prominently attributed to him in all marketing materials.
Moreover, Vitra tirelessly researched this issue when they put together the Nelson book. They confirmed the Nelson office was not involved in the ceramic wall clocks or that aluminum rosewood model that is listed in the Meridian catalog with them. (See George Nelson: Architect, Writer, Designer, Teacher, List of Works, at 284-303 (listing all clocks attributed to Nelson's Office).) No evidence of involvement by the Nelson Office in those clocks was found in the Nelson archives, which contain drawings of almost all of the other clocks.
Furthermore, Irving left Nelson's studio in 1964 so it is very unlikely he was involved in any of those designs from a timing perspective.
So, again, if anyone has information other than Howard Miller using Nelson's old hands on these clocks, I'd love to hear it.
|
 |
 |
posted by MidMod50
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
06-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
From what I understand
Umanoff was working for the Nelson Office during his time designing clocks for Howard Miller.
Those Meridian Italian ceramic dishes were sent over here and Howard Miller did the motor and hands installation, and I don't think that the George Nelson office would allowed use of their hands on products that they had nothing to do with, or approved.
I also think that as soon as the arrangement ended between George Nelson and Howard Miller, that signalled the end of Howard Miller's allowed use of the Nelson hands.
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
06-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Umanoff never worked for Nelson ...
This too is confirmed in George Nelson: Architect, Writer, Designer, Teacher at 338 (Members of the Nelson Office [including clock designers Harper, Pollock, and DeRespinis]). None of this is to say that some of those Meridian and Umanoff clocks aren't nice. They're just not Nelson designs.
As for the use of the hands, and this part is pure speculation, I suspect that Howard Miller bought those designs, along with the right to manufacture the clocks themselves, from the Nelson office and could use them as they saw fit.
And sometimes unfit. One classic example of this is the ball-inspired clock that uses wooden squares with Roman numerals on them in place of the balls. They come up regularly on ebay. It is model #571 (rather than the ball clock's #4755) and is most certainly NOT a Nelson design, even though it uses every piece of the ball clock with the exception of the balls themselves.
|
 |
 |
posted by MidMod50
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
07-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
That's interesting information, MidMod
since I've been trying to understand how and when the relationship between Howard Miller Clocks and George Nelson ended and (apparently) soured, since anyone who calls Howard Miller these days gets a total cold shoulder when asked about anything during the Nelson era.
If indeed the clock hands were owned by Howard Miller, then I wonder why when the arrangement ended, clocks having Nelson hands were sold with the standard antique Howard Miller hands.
Since I don't yet have the book you refer to (the Vitra exhibition book??) I'm surprised that Umanoff wasn't involved with George Nelson. His designs certainly are a continuation of the Nelson style and his stuff is often refered to as being connected with Nelson.
Nothing lasts forever, but It's still weird about 1) why Howard Miller is so weird about anything relating to George Nelson, and 2) why they didn't have anything to do with the reissue sceme that happened between Jacquline Nelson and Vitra.
Certainly, the story has not been totally written.
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
08-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Zoo Timers
Not to confuse anyone, but I was told by Harper that the Zoo Timers were done by Umanoff - which wouldn't that mean Umanoff did work for Nelson?
|
 |
 |
posted by reactcreative
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
08-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Here's a detail of my brochure copy
Either Howard Miller was wrong, Irving Harper was mistaken, or Umanoff worked for Nelson.
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
edited on 08-Nov-08 03:58 PM [edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
11-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
I'm afraid Irving was mistaken on this count ...
Irving had left Nelson's office by 1964. The Zootimers were designed in 1965 principally by William Cannan of the Nelson Office. (See George Nelson: Architect, Writer, Designer Teacher [List of Works] at 299.) Umanoff -- not an employee of the Nelson Office -- had nothing to do with them.
|
 |
 |
posted by MidMod50
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
11-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Thanks for the clarification, MidMod,
but it's so murky as to when the Nelson arrangement ended with Howard Miller.
1) when did it end?
2) why did it end?
3) were the Nelson clocks immediately discontinued at that time?
4) was Howard Miller allowed to continue to use the Nelson clock hands on subsequent clocks that Nelson had nothing to do with?
5) when did Umanoff start? was there any overlap?
Because Howard Miller is a such a pain in the neck about this era, it's hard to sort all of this out.
MidMod, you keep refering to a publication. Can you be specific about this?
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
12-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
George Nelson and Howard Miller...
My attempt to answer Barry's questions:
1) when did it end?
The Nelson Office designed the vast majority of their clocks for Howard Miller prior to 1965. The date coincides closely with Irving's departure from the Nelson Office, but make of that what you will. I don't have any inside knowledge. After the 1965 Zootimers (there appear to be no other Nelson clocks from that year), there were a few one-off series for Howard Miller like the Institutional (Office) Series (1968) [presumably related to Nelson's development of the Action Office Series for Herman Miller], three crappy plastic clocks in 1977, and the Memphis inspired "Tempo '21 Series (1984).
2) why did it end?
I have no idea, and haven't been able to get a straight answer on this one. My guess is that the Nelson Office lost the commission with Howard Miller and that Howard Miller went in another direction with Umanoff and others. Why? My educated guess is reduced sales. Most of the best-selling icons -- the ball (1949), steering wheel (1949), and spike (1952) -- had been available for between 12 and 15 years by 1965. Presumably, sales of those designs were down. The more recent clocks (like the motion notion series) were intricate and extravagant and thus more expensive to manufacture. Judging by the limited numbers available now and the high sales prices at the time (two or three times the ball clock prices), I presume they weren't big sellers. Look at Umanoff's designs. They were made of cheaper materials, were easy to manufacture, and sold for far less than Nelson's intricate clocks. Thus, presumably, they were so profitable. [Btw, this also explains why Howard Miller currently manufactures curio cabinets and marked up grandfather clocks. More people want that junk than good, clean design.]
3) were the Nelson clocks immediately discontinued at that time?
No. The Nelson clocks continued to be sold for quite some time after Nelson stopped designing for Howard Miller (with the above-noted exceptions).
4) was Howard Miller allowed to continue to use the Nelson clock hands on subsequent clocks that Nelson had nothing to do with?
Presumably, but I haven't seen the contracts. Clearly, they did use them.
5) when did Umanoff start? was there any overlap?
I have no idea, but I haven't seen any pre-1965 Umanoffs out there.
With regard to the publication, I've been referring to the new Vitra book on Nelson. It's an excellent sourcebook for all things Nelson, though understandably it does not go into depth about the ups and downs of the relationship between Nelson and Howard Miller.
Obviously, I welcome any insight others might have, but that is what I know/think on the subject.
|
 |
 |
posted by MidMod50
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
13-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
Thanxalot, MidMod!
I'm planning to buy the Vitra book, which probably won't be available for sale here at the Walker Art Center (in Minneapolis, where the Saarinen exhibition is currently) until the first of the year, but I plan to buy one. No one else seems to have it for sale in the US that I can find.
Thanks again for the useful information. Isn't it strange that Howard Miller had (apparently) no interest in the reissues that went to Vitra? I'm certain they would've done 'em if they had wanted to.
O...one more thing, MidMod, if you want to email me privately (barrymn1@msn.com), I'll be glad to send you my Excel spreadsheet on all of the Nelson clocks I've been able to locate by number and description (over 300 by now, including variants....)
|
 |
 |
posted by barrympls
edited on 13-Nov-08 12:29 AM [edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
14-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
mid mod thanks for the ...
mid mod thanks for the info..
I am trying to get t he Nelson vitra book but they say it will not be available to the end of December here in the US .
|
 |
 |
posted by LRF
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
18-Nov-08 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
posted by Mark
[edit]
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
  |
 |